Campaign message 4

We must be ever vigilant to ensure that

the power of government not be used against the interests 

of the least powerful of our citizens. 

We did this to women in general for decades with disastrous results. 

We now allow/encourage government 

to treat TANF (our national welfare program) recipients with disrespect. 

I don’t understand this, 

but since I believe we are good, caring people, 

I suspect our intentions are good and our behaviors misguided.

Since TANF started in 1996,

 the average family has needed the program for only 20 months. 

These families used it as a temporary support 

while they returned to self sufficiency. 

This is what the program was designed for.  

We should be applauding them. 

                                                                                                m. rosenzweig 2012

Campaign Message 3

Our stickiest problem is the extent 

to which good jobs are tied to weapons development. 

Most important, these weapons may not be relevant 

to our national security. 

My sense is that war has changed. 

We have no way of realigning resources 

to accommodate this change. 

If we are looking at a new definition of war at all, 

it is behind super sealed closed doors 

and we are probably only including past warriors in the discussion. 

This is like the British Ministry maintaining it as top secret 

that their red uniforms make great targets 

in the New England woods 

and then holding Burgoyne personally responsible 

for the outcome at Saratoga. 

We need to open up the discussion of what war is 

and where in it are our best interests. 

This is too important to leave to the Pentagon, 

and certainly not to the various congressional committees 

which ensure chaos. 

Each state needs to be involved in the discussion 

and subsequent conclusions need to become 

the foundation for future planning. 

In the mean time, we need to transition jobs 

and their supporting resources 

to other more sensible things as soon as we are able to be sure 

their relevance to war has become obsolete. 

We are not very good at transitioning large segments 

of the workforce to new endeavors, 

especially in the public sector, 

but we know how to do it with minimum disruption 

to either the workers or to their output. 

Campaign message 2:

Once we understand how 

big business and government are intertwined, 

we can begin realigning resources in order to 

better respond to the needs of more of our people. 

For example, we are all devastated 

when one of our mentally ill is killed 

in the process of protecting him; 

or, when a caring father shoots his wife and three children. 

These tragedies occur all too frequently 

and although we invest heavily in preventing them, 

the perpetrators and victims live isolated 

from the resources that might help them 

and there is little follow up within our social welfare community 

to help us understand why they happen in the first place. 

I suspect we could do better 

if we moved some of our resources currently invested 

at the federal level to our communities 

where we could rebuild our outreach 

and early intervention programs. 

At the very least, we should be experimenting 

with more effective ways to apply 

our social welfare resources. 

We now have the dubious distinction 

of killing twice as many of our children 

as any other industrialized country 

while at the same time investing heavily 

in protective services for children. 

I suspect that all violence is related to all other violence 

and suggest we take on the task 

of understanding this better so we can 

better achieve the goal of personal safety in our communities. Clearly we need better guidance 

from academia on this since there is 

much misinformation and denial 

driving violence at home.

                                                               m. rosenzweig 2010

Campaign message: 1

Please begin by viewing this video.

If I were to run for the Senate seat 

currently held by Olympia Snowe, 

I could only have a different message from any other candidate

 if my campaign is 
not founded on asking for your money. 

Instead, I would ask for your vote,

 and, more importantly, I would ask 

for your help in disseminating my message. 

Since we are the people of a very strong nation

 at a time of great transition, I would acknowledge

 our responsibility not only to ourselves and our grandchildren

 but to all the people of the world.

My message is about “best interest”. 

It is a term I inherited while doing child welfare work.  

It is a term I struggled with for 40 years

 and finally came to accept that

 the best interest of a child cannot exist in isolation.

 It exists in concert with the best interest

 of her/his family and community.

So, in order to serve the best interest 

of the State of Maine and the United States,

 I need to be clear about the larger context of best interest. 

In its broadest sense, there is the best interest

 of all living things. 

This we have to work on

 with all other nations of the world.

 Here at home, we essentially have two groups 

to satisfy the best interest of, 

the very rich and the not so rich. 

For both, best interest is the same regardless of where we look. 

It differs mostly in terms of power, 

and that is why I cannot ask for your money 

because, in doing so, I would compromise the office of senator, giving power disproportionately to the very rich.

First and foremost, we need good jobs 

with benefits for all our people. 

We need the help of the very rich in creating these jobs 

since they control the capital; 

but more importantly we need the creativity 

of those now working in their basement or garage 

on ideas most of us will never even think of 

until they turn up in the market place. 

The very rich should enjoy a tax exemption 

in those years when they create new jobs. 

Such exemptions should be based on a percentage increase 

over and above jobs they already support. 

This recognizes the mutual benefit of jobs 

for both labor and management. 

Other tax exemptions should be reexamined 

for their usefulness at supporting employment

 and well being.

Our economy is a complex construction of both 

the public and private sectors.

 I will develop an illustration of how these two sectors work

 in tandem to enable our prosperity.
(Segment one of a three part video on jobs
 can be seen here.)

 The notion that government is too big, which it is, is simplistic 

and the notion that corporations are bad, which they are, 

is simplistic as well. 

We have to reexamine both and support the components of each 

which contribute most to our well being. 

Therefore we have to understand them better. 

In the mean time, we must continue to lean on small businesses

 for our strength and help them survive both 

the pressures of government

 and those of big business.

                                                                         mrosenzweig 2011